360 Degree Review Software Systems: The Most Complete Guide

You can put off making a selection on the best 360 degree review software systems for a long time, but what does that really achieve? It’s just a timewasting tactic that buys very little and may cost a lot. The wiser approach is to thoroughly scrutinise your options and single out the one that has the most positives going for it.

With the increasing practice of creating project groups to complete tasks, a 360-review can give a line manager a wider insight into a person’s skills and how they interact with others. This can be particularly informative when considering leadership, interpersonal skills, teamwork, work practices, accountability, and more – something that you cannot get from more traditional methods. Developmental feedback must guarantee that the information being collected is confidential to the affected employee. In other words, the employee's supervisor does not see the developmental feedback. The philosophy behind this concept is that the employee cannot be harmed if the feedback is not positive. This confidentiality creates an open environment. Revolutionary changes in organization cultures have made traditional single-source assessments illogical and impractical. Among these changes are increasing participative leadership, empowering employees, improving customer service, integrating quality initiatives into the mainstream of business activities, reengineering, moving to competency- and team-based rewards, and ending entitlements. It is recommended to give 360 degree reviewers an option to leave a comment on each of the indicators to explain a particular rate that they set. Sometimes such comments are required for low or high rates, which certainly provides additional food for thought for reviewees, but may lead to reviewers avoiding setting low/high rates to not write additional text if they don’t want to do that. In traditional 360 evaluations, multi-rater feedback upped the sheer number of people participating in the process and the subsequent time invested. Fortunately, most multi-rater feedback systems now have online entry and reporting systems. This has almost eliminated this former downside. Your 360 degree feedbackwill need to be adapted and designed especially for your initiative. Ideally the survey itself will speak directly to the relevant themes. It will be named and branded appropriately and, perhaps more crucially, the process will be tailored carefully to the initiative. The timing will dovetail and the support will automatically fall into the right space.



The 360 degree feedback process creates a beauty contest, where popularity or sociability is more important than performance. No other argument has been presented more often than the concern about popularity bias. Those who present this argument seem to forget that single-source assessments have been consistently criticized as a political or popularity contest with the boss. Nepotism can undermine a 360 degree feedbackproject. In a large multinational, privately owned food company that employed many family members, the process yielded information that accurately reflected the high, medium, and low performers. Nevertheless, the politics of nepotism defeated the 360 degree feedbackprocess because family members felt threatened. 360 degree feedbackgives employees a broad picture of their skills, working style and team relationships. It encourages open and honest communication between staff and ensures that feedback is not solely given by the manager. It also helps change employees' perception of their performance, as evaluators often have additional insights that the manager may not have. In this way, it helps provide a more complete and accurate picture of employee performance. 360 degree feedbackis gathered from all around you: your direct reports, peers, internal and external “customers” (where appropriate) and your line manager. The results are then collated with your own responses and used to generate a report. The report is discussed in a confidential developmental conversation with a trained facilitator. Researching 360 feedback software is known to the best first step in determining your requirements and brushing up on your understanding in this area.

The New Raw Material Of Business

If the 360 degree process is run top down by the management few would believe that management doesn’t peek behind the curtain to see who said what. The process and the data should be managed by an external consultant that is not part of the team or chain of command. Safeguards to process fairness are critical to the process and can be tested in user surveys. Policy safeguards seek to ensure the content validity of the evaluation criteria and the validity of the policy for selecting evaluation team members. If safeguards are unavailable to address every concern users have about the process and data integrity, 360 degree feedbackshould not be used for appraisal and pay decisions. If anyone is missed out of the 360 process, it means the process is no longer 360 degrees. It also means that you can miss out on vital information that can help the employee receive a proper appraisal about their performance. Anyone who exercises some form of leadership, particularly if they lead a team of people is suitable for 360 degree feedback. It is not appropriate for someone who is carrying out a technical role primarily as an individual contributor. The model is based on the premise that successful outcomes are achieved through people and enabled through leaders who are self-aware and values-driven. Some proponents of using 360-degree feedback for appraisal believe that bosses cannot make people change if they don't know what the individual's feedback report looks like and that without the boss's input into the process the individual may choose the "wrong" thing to work on. Evaluating 360 degree feedback system can uncover issues that may be affecting employee performance.

When done right, 360-feedback has a host of benefits. These include strengthening accountability and collaboration among teams and reducing biases. But this kind of feedback isn't without its flaws. Look at including a ranking survey or a “forced-choice” section in your 360 degree appraisal where you might, for instance, show all your dimension headings and ask people to rate which two or three are strongest for this person and which two or three are weakest. This allows you to be sure that every participant will get colourful data, regardless of how bad or good they are generally. It also provides participants with a very interesting insight on how people really feel about them and gives more evidence of their leadership brand. Because a 360 degree survey can include ratings on 50-75 behaviors, a person will receive very specific insight into how they interact with others. Many times, participants are exposed to behaviors and interactions that they have not considered before, such as: “Inspires in others a sense of purpose for the work we do.” This level of detail expands the range of possibilities when deciding on growth opportunities. 360 feedback focuses on behaviors and competencies more than on basic skills, job requirements, and performance objectives. These things are most appropriately addressed by an employee and his/her manager as part of an annual review and performance appraisal process. It is certainly possible and can be beneficial to incorporate 360 feedback into a larger performance management process, but only with clear communication on how the 360 feedback will be used. 360-degree feedback is one of the best methods for understanding personal and organizational developmental needs. You may discover what keeps employees from working successfully together and how your organization’s policies, procedures, and approaches affect employee success. In many organizations that use 360-degree feedback, the focus has switched to identifying strengths. That makes sense for employee performance development. The specificity/anonymity conundrum takes another turn when the idea of what is 360 degree feedback is involved.

360-Degree Instruments

A competency-based rewards system recognizes what people accomplish at work rather than rewards them for acquiring additional knowledge or skills. When core competencies are communicated to employees, they understand the behaviors that distinguish good from poor performance. Articulated core competencies also allow the organization to create a competitive advantage by differentiating itself in the marketplace and helping it to achieve its goals and objectives. Most organizations initiate a 360 degree feedbackproject with a single survey, but some develop additional competency sets for special groups or purposes. For example, an individual competency like "Communicates" can be refined with second-level competencies such as oral, written, listening, public presentation, nonverbal, and other specific behaviors. While the population you target for 360 feeback will depend on the aims of the programme, most multi-rater feedback processes tend to start with the senior team before being cascaded down the management levels. The benefit of this approach is that others see senior leaders taking part first, building confidence and buy-in to the programme. 360 degree technology should help organize and collect data for deeper analytics and research to help talent professionals optimize and improve growth and development efforts, provide prescriptive recommendations so participants have an idea of how to get started and facilitate the use of coaches so that individuals are effectively supported during the 360 Performance Review process. The use of 360-degree feedback for the purpose of development may not be considered a customary practice in some cultures. Thus, it is imperative that we understand where 360-degree feedback might fit within the overall cultural framework of development in the country of interest. Only then can we examine the compatibility of the constructs these instruments attempt to measure. Keeping up with the latest developments regarding 360 degree feedback is a pre-cursor to Increased employee motivation and building the link between performance and rewards.

In addition to rating questions (indicators) on competencies in a 360 degree review, consider adding open-ended questions which require a textual comment from reviewers. Although open-ended questions take more time to answer than rating questions, textual comments may contain various insights that will make your review much more valuable for participants. If implemented correctly, 360 reviews can boost morale and give guidance on where an employee can improve their working relationships. However, if used incorrectly, it can make an employee feel demotivated, or disliked in the workplace. Be sure to stress that even though employees should express their concerns, positive feedback should be included as well, to make sure it isn’t wholly negative. 360 feedback is a key part of continuous performance management, which is the process of providing regular, ongoing feedback to employees throughout the year. It aims to replace the traditional performance management model, which is over-reliant on the annual performance review. Continuous performance management aims to create an environment where feedback is given regularly, and teams can perform to their maximum potential. 360 reviews have become a popular part of the continuous performance management cycle because they allow us to assess a broader picture of our behavior and skills. These can be consequently discussed in our regular employee-manager meetings. Involving those who regularly collaborate with the employee in the feedback process, rather than the usual senior managers, provides a panoramic perspective of the employee’s progress, strengths, and weaknesses. Ideally, gathering responses from the surrounding staff will help the employee sharpen every angle of their work performance. Making sense of 360 appraisal eventually allows for personal and organisational performance development.

Transformation And Transition

If you imagine the 360 degrees of a circle, with the individual in the middle, they are getting feedback from those above and below them on an org chart, as well as those who are horizontal. Executive coaching has been on the rise for decades as a strategic investment in human capital. When well-designed and delivered, coaching has been found to be one of the most effective approaches for developing senior leaders and enhancing the performance of their teams and organizations. An effective feedback form is the mark of a streamlined, well-planned 360-degree feedback process propped in place by an equally efficient automated 360 feedback system. Proper implementation along the above lines is the key for organizations and the individuals in it to make the best of the feedback they receive and boldly meet their respective futures. Check out extra details regarding 360 degree review software systems on this Wikipedia web page.

Related Articles:

Further Findings About 360-Degree feedback instruments
Additional Information About 360 feedback projects
Extra Findings About 360 assessment applications
Further Insight On 360-Degree review processes
Additional Insight With Regard To 360-Degree feedback technologies
Supplementary Insight With Regard To 360 degree assessment projects
More Background Insight About 360 degree evaluation objectives

Back to the Home Page